YES! THANK YOU to Rep Ted Lieu, who just cornered Pam Bondi into committing PERJURY. It’s all on tape, ready to go, for her impeachment and indictment. Here’s the key moment he cornered her. Full story and latest updates below 👇

YES! THANK YOU to Rep Ted Lieu, who just cornered Pam Bondi into committing PERJURY. It’s all on tape, ready to go, for her impeachment and indictment. Here’s the key moment he cornered her. Lieu: I want to know were there any underage girls at any party with Jeffrey Epstein?

First, Bondi was speechless. She hesitated, sitting there silently. She took a full 8 seconds to answer. Bondi: This is so ridiculous. And that they are trying to deflect from all the great things Donald Trump has done. There is no evidence that Donald Trump has committed a crime, everyone knows that. BUSTED. Wrong answer. Rep Lieu did not hold back. Lieu: I’m going to put up another document from a witness who called the FBI’s National Threat Operation Center, because I believe you just lied under oath. Bondi: Don’t you EVER accuse me of a crime! But Lieu wasn’t intimidated by her shouted. He persisted. And read the document aloud. Lieu: It’s all on video tape. You said there’s no evidence of a crime, I’m showing you a witness statement who called in to the FBI. Here is a witness statement who called into the FBI’s Threat Operations Center. He drove Donald Trump around in a limo. He overheard Donald Trump said to Jeffrey on his cell phone. He was so angry he was going to stop the limo and hurt Donald Trump. He met a girl who said she was raped by Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein. She later had her head blown off and officers at the scene said that could not have been suicide. Beautiful to watch. Time for the head of the Department of Justice to get what’s coming to her — JUSTICE.

YES! THANK YOU to Ted Lieu — the moment that set Washington on fire 🔥
What just unfolded between Ted Lieu and Pam Bondi is being called one of the most explosive congressional exchanges in recent memory — and it’s all on record.
🎯 The Moment Everything Changed
During a tense House hearing on the Epstein files, Lieu zeroed in on a single, critical claim made by Bondi under oath:
👉 She stated: “There is no evidence that Donald Trump has committed a crime.” �
Congressman Ted Lieu
That’s when Lieu struck.
He pointed to existing DOJ materials and released documents that appear to contradict that statement — arguing that evidence does exist, or at minimum, that her claim was misleading. �
Congressman Ted Lieu
According to reporting from the hearing:
Lieu directly accused Bondi of lying under oath
The exchange escalated into a heated confrontation
Bondi refused to retract and doubled down on her statement �
Axios +1
⚖️ Why This Is So Serious
This isn’t just political theater — it cuts straight into potential perjury territory.
Legal experts note:
Perjury requires proving a statement was false, material, and knowingly made
That’s a high legal bar, but not impossible �
Salon.com
Still, the fallout is already moving fast:
Lieu and allies have formally called for a special counsel investigation
Lawmakers argue the contradiction between testimony and documents is “evidence of false statements under oath” �
Congressman Ted Lieu
💥 The Political Shockwave
This moment didn’t happen in isolation — it’s part of a much bigger storm:
Bondi has already faced intense bipartisan criticism over handling of Epstein files
Lawmakers across parties have raised concerns about transparency and credibility
The hearing itself devolved into personal attacks, shouting, and chaos �
The Guardian
And now, this exchange with Lieu may be the centerpiece of future investigations.
🚨 What Happens Next?
Here’s what to watch:
👀 Calls for formal perjury investigation could gain traction
⚖️ Possible special counsel appointment (if pressure builds)
🏛️ Congressional moves toward impeachment inquiries (still uncertain)
📂 Further document releases that could confirm or weaken Lieu’s claim
🧠 Bottom Line
Did Ted Lieu just corner Pam Bondi into perjury?
➡️ He made the accusation — forcefully and on record.
➡️ There is documented contradiction being debated.
➡️ But no court has yet proven perjury.
That distinction matters — because what happens next depends on evidence, not just the moment.