JUST IN: The U.S. Supreme Court rules Donald Trump does not have full immunity and may face a subpoena in the Epstein case, following Bill Clinton’s testimony A dramatic new development is sending shockwaves through Washington

A dramatic new development is sending shockwaves through Washington.
The Supreme Court of the United States has ruled that former President Donald Trump does not have full immunity from legal process, opening the door for a possible subpoena connected to the investigation surrounding convicted financier Jeffrey Epstein.

The decision comes shortly after former President Bill Clinton reportedly provided testimony as part of the ongoing scrutiny into Epstein’s network of powerful associates. Legal analysts say the court’s ruling could allow investigators to compel testimony or documents from Trump if prosecutors determine they are relevant to the case.
According to constitutional experts, the ruling signals that no current or former president is automatically shielded from cooperating with legal investigations, especially in cases involving potential criminal inquiries.
Political reaction has been immediate and deeply divided:
Supporters of Trump say the move is politically motivated.
Critics argue it represents a critical step toward accountability.
The Epstein case has long drawn attention because of the number of high-profile figures connected to the late financier’s social circle. Epstein died in 2019 while awaiting trial on federal sex-trafficking charges, but investigations and civil litigation tied to his network continue to unfold.
With the Supreme Court’s decision, legal experts say the possibility of a historic subpoena involving a former U.S. president is now firmly on the table.
👉 Do you think powerful leaders should be required to testify in investigations like anyone else? Join the conversation below.